Diane Rosenfeld

28 Mar

Diane Rosenfeld

Diane Rosenfeld is currently working with states to utilize GPS monitoring of batterers by offering assistance to state legislators on developing and implementing legislation.  The legislation that she proposes requires offenders to wear an electronic bracelet equipped with GPS, which enables law enforcement to monitor the movements of an offender.  Rosenfeld notes that this early warning system can be the difference between life and death for endangered women.  Protective orders, which commonly establish exclusionary zones from which the offender is prohibited, offer no protection unless enforced by police – Rosenfeld claims that about a quarter of protective orders are violated. GPS monitoring would likely have several beneficial effects for protecting women:

  • Ensures more effective police enforcement of protective orders by alerting police when a batterer is in the exclusionary zone.
  • Encourages women to seek protective orders, as they can be more confident that they will be effective tools.
  • Dissuades batterers who may otherwise feel that they can violate the protective order without consequence.
  • Provides courts with proof of a violation of a protective order.

Police in 15 states are beginning to use GPS technology for those who violate restraining orders against them.  Each state’s program differs, but in general, offenders wear an ankle bracelet that is tracked by GPS and monitored 24 hours a day. They are barred from certain “restriction zones,” such as such as the victim’s home, workplace, a child’s school, or anywhere their victims are known to be, and if they violate those zones, authorities know instantly. Rosenfeld highlights the success of the pilot program she helped create here in Massachusetts. The Greater Newburyport High-Risk Case Management Team reports no domestic homicides, 100 percent success using GPS monitoring (meaning neither re-assaults nor violations of protection orders) and a conviction rate of offenders of more than 90 percent.

There are some potential drawbacks of the GPS monitoring systems, though.  The devices and tracking systems can be expensive, and while some jurisdictions require the batterer to cover the cost, other states have declined to participate in the program altogther.  Additionally, detractors note that the devices could lull victims into a false sense of security when they should instead remain alert and away from potentially dangerous situations.  Finally, tracking of batterers raises First Amendment privacy concerns–although tracking bracelets have been allowed in other contexts, such as house arrest.

Rosenfeld notes that 3-4 women are killed every day by someone close to them, and that GPS monitoring can play a vastly important role in reducing that number by providing women with an extra layer of protection and law enforcement with a head start on stopping a batterer who violates a protective order.


2 Responses to “Diane Rosenfeld”

  1. Petra April 8, 2011 at 1:47 am #

    Thank for your taking the lead in saving lives. We have been educating attorneys and judges here in California about victim notification to make a restraining order stick AND to provide a tool for the victim to feel safer.
    Unfortunately it seems to be a never ending battle as everyone “loves” the idea, yet no-one does anything to actually utilize this potentially live saving tool.
    I applaud you for your efforts.

  2. bonnie russell April 11, 2011 at 11:13 am #

    Since the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Castle Rock vs. Gonzales, that police officers aren’t required to enforce restraining orders, using GPS with Victim Notification in Family Courts, (See Familylawcourts.com) puts the focus where is should be, assisting potential victims. Since nursing homes are GPSing patients who wander, and parents are GPSing their kids at ski resorts, GPS no longer is considered simply a criminal matter. Using GPS with Victim Notification in Family Court, Prevents further violence, and saves lives and money. It’s much less expensive than a murder prosecution.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: